- Related by Author
- Related by Topic
Jerusalem in International Diplomacy
By Dore Gold
Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs (JCPA), March 5, 2013
The July 2000 Camp David Summit was clearly a diplomatic failure. It resulted largely, though not exclusively, from the insurmountable gap between Israel and the PLO over the issue of Jerusalem. Prime Minister Ehud Barak and President Bill Clinton insisted on holding the summit apparently assuming that the diplomatic gaps between the parties could ultimately be bridged. Were they equipped with a more accurate assessment of the positions of the principal parties on the Jerusalem question, they might have anticipated that the summit would not succeed. For the PLO, the various Clinton proposals were a non-starter. But for Israel, as well, Barak's readiness to even consider concessions on Jerusalem led to the collapse of parliamentary support for his government, a massive public demonstration against the U.S. proposals, and finally, when combined with Palestinian violence, Barak's loss in national elections by an unprecedented majority to Ariel Sharon.
Israel suffered from a more fundamental diplomatic failure of its own, beyond its misreading of the Palestinian position on Jerusalem. The structure of the peace process, whereby Israel has focused all its energies on an abstract, albeit worthy, goal of peace, while the Palestinians' diplomatic energies were concentrated on a concrete goal of achieving a Palestinian state with a capital in Jerusalem, inevitably led the negotiations in the direction of the party with the more articulated objective -- namely, the Palestinian goal of sovereignty in Jerusalem. This diplomatic asymmetry led to a clear-cut erosion of Israel's own claims.
Yet, a careful reading of the historical record of the Jewish presence in Jerusalem and an understanding of the international legal rights of the Jewish people to their historical capital might have led negotiators to take a stronger stand on behalf of Israel's rights in the city. This study was conceived with the purpose of providing both a more realistic understanding of the actual positions of the principal parties to the Jerusalem question and a deeper appreciation of the rights Israel possesses in Jerusalem for any future negotiations.
Topic: Arab-Israeli Relations, Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, Diplomacy, Jerusalem, International Relations, Arab-Israeli Conflict, Israeli-Arab Relations, Israeli-Arab Conflict, Israeli-Palestinian Relations
Coverage: Jerusalem, Israel
Copyright Holder: Publisher
Copyright Information: Download for personal use, freely distribute link
Gold, Dore. Jerusalem in International Diplomacy. Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs (JCPA). 5 March 2013: http://www.bjpa.org/Publications/details.cfm?PublicationID=16095
» View Publication
(PDF, 46 Kb)